Recent US election congressional results look fishy... Watch the link on how electronic voting machines routinely give false results>>>
Presidential hopeful, Congressman Ron Paul, issued a statement on January 12,
2008 stating the reasons he will not pursue a recount of the votes cast in the
New Hampshire primary. His statement is
here. My email box is full of angry responses from Ron Paul supporters.
There is going to be a recount which begins January 16, 2008. This is a grass
roots recount effort started by the 'Granny Warriors,' and funded by Americans
who do not believe we have accurate elections counts. Only the candidate can
request the recount. Dr. Paul's top advisers have assured him the count was
accurate, therefore he should not challenge it. The Granny Warriors, approached
another GOP candidate, Albert
Howard, who has filed and paid the initial fees for the recount. Democratic
hopeful, Dennis Kucinich, has also indicated he is requesting a recount.
Congressman Paul states, "My campaign staff and I have analyzed the numbers
in New Hampshire and I have reached the conclusion that it was the high turnout
-- not vote fraud or counting errors -- that left us with eight percent of the
vote." So, he believes his staff has done due diligence, even though the 31 vote
"error" for Sutton, New Hampshire, is not mentioned in this polished piece of
word smithing. The text about vote tallying and "watching," is all well and
fine, but millions of us know it's what happens inside the machines. If you
haven't seen it yet, please do take 10 minutes to watch this voting counting
machine during a test where 6 no votes and 2 yes votes are fed into it. The
demonstrator confidently hits the button to get the vote tally. The results: 7
yes and 1 no. Additionally, one might want to click here and look at this hand
recount because it clearly shows there is a serious problem with the vote count
and that's why I support the efforts of the Granny Warriors.
No comments:
Post a Comment